Abstract:
The number of violations of international humanitarian law's norms had become an increasing phenomenon. The situation requires urgent and effective international control and prosecution in international tribunals for grave crimes presenting a real threat to security and peace. In order
to control such crimes, the relevant legal mechanisms for international prosecution were established through the creation of International Criminal Tribunal for former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR). However, the long court delays and high
operational expenses of these tribunals led to the establishment of International Criminal Court (ICC). This article will critically assess the perspectives of the ICC in terms of its legitimacy and effectiveness in comparison with the ICTY and ICTR.