Abstract:
The introduction of open government has been used in many countries to improve the transparency, accountability of the
state, and promote participation by citizens in collaborative governance. Its potential for public services improvement,
citizen empowerment, and a positive impact on reducing corruption have attracted scholarly attention. Set alongside this,
open government initiatives have facilitated greater access to information which can be used to hold governments to
account and, in so doing, build trust between citizens and the state. While open government principles sit easily in
democratic systems, some authoritarian states have also adopted this concept. This raises two questions. First, is there
evidence that open collaboration, as the most developed form of open government, has empowered citizens in autocracies?
Second, and more generally, why would authoritarian regimes seek to adopt open government when the concepts of
autocracy and openness are antithetical? This paper attempts to address these questions using three case study countries in
Central Asia: Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Kyrgyzstan which adopted open government policies. It finds evidence of co-
optation, network authoritarianism, and state unresponsiveness/resistance to citizens’ inputs.
